Philippe Haspeslagh and David Jemison (‘Understanding acquisition integration approaches’, 1991, in De Wit & Meyer, 2010, Reading 6.3) distinguish two main dimensions in acquisition integration. One of these dimensions is the need for organizational autonomy. What is the second dimension?
Corporate independence need
Strategic interdependence need
Network preservation need
International linkages need.
Haspeslagh and Jemison (‘Understanding acquisition integration approaches’, 1991, in De Wit & Meyer, 2010, Reading 6.3) discuss three different kinds of capability transfer. Which of the following options do they NOT mention?
Resource sharing
Functional skill transfer
Strategic knowledge transfer
General management capability transfer.
According to Haspeslagh and Jemison (‘Understanding acquisition integration approaches’, 1991, in De Wit & Meyer, 2010, Reading 6.3), when two organizations first coexist, and then gradually become increasingly interdependent, this kind of acquisition integration approach can be classified as:
Preservation
Symbiosis
Holding
Absorption.
According to Haspeslagh and Jemison (‘Understanding acquisition integration approaches’, 1991, in De Wit & Meyer, 2010, Reading 6.3), an acquisition integration approach that implies a full consolidation, over time, of the operations, organization, and culture of both organizations, can be classified as: